Assisted Dying Bill passes Second Reading: What next?

News

Assisted Dying Bill passes Second Reading: What next? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 57

29 Nov 2024

©UK Parliament

From the emotional weight of the Assisted Dying Bill’s historic Second Reading to the first Cabinet resignation under Keir Starmer’s leadership, this has been a whirlwind week of high-stakes drama and political intrigue in Westminster. Nearly three million people have signed a parliamentary e-petition calling for another general election and it’s been a week of party defections and divisions. We unpack what it all means for the future of this Parliament.

LISTEN

This week saw MPs engage in a solemn and respectful debate over landmark legislation. The Assisted Dying Bill cleared its Second Reading with a decisive majority of 55 votes, but the solemn silence that greeted the announcement of the result in the House of Commons reflected the gravity of the decision. There is still a long way to go if the Assisted Dying Bill is to make it to the statute book, but it cleared this first hurdle. So, what happens now as it moves into the Public Bill Committee?

Meanwhile, a petition calling for a general election has amassed nearly three million signatures. It has sparked a debate and perhaps tells us something about public discontent with the current Government after just six months. But it has also revealed the constitutional illiteracy of some of our politicians and the commentariat. Despite its size, this petition holds no legal weight, though it will trigger a House of Commons debate in January having crossed the 100,000 signature threshold. What approach will the Government take?

In other news, Sir Keir Starmer’s Cabinet saw its first resignation this week as Transport Secretary Louise Haigh stepped down. The move came after a past offence - declared to Starmer before her appointment - resurfaced. We unpack the implications for the Government’s ethics bar: has it been set too low, or is this the high standard needed to rebuild public trust in politicians and Parliament?

← Back to Parliament Matters homepage

Listen on our YouTube channel (captioned)

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Resources

Hansard Society

The Assisted Dying Bill: A guide to the Private Member's Bill process
Event recording: The Assisted Dying Bill: How will Parliament decide? Exploring the parliamentary process (Tuesday 26 November)
Anna Bocking-Welch, Richard Huzzey, Cristina Leston-Bandeira and Henry Miller (2024), What’s the point of petitions? What the last century reveals about petitioning and people power in modern Britain

Transcript

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There are consequently minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

[00:00:00] Intro: You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production, supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

[00:00:18] Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

[00:00:24] Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark Darcy, coming up this week.

[00:00:27] Ruth Fox: The bill to legalise assisted dying clears its first hurdle in the commons, so what happens now?

[00:00:33] Mark D'Arcy: Could, should, a petition with millions of signatures force a government to resign and call an election?

[00:00:39] Ruth Fox: Spoiler, no. Plus, Sir Kier Starmer's first cabinet resignation, Tory defections and Liberal splits in an eventful Westminster week.

[00:00:56] Mark D'Arcy: But first Ruth, we've delayed the pod a day, precisely so that we can take in the result of MP's first chance to vote on the Terminally Ill Adult (End of Life) Bill, the assisted dying bill as it's generally referred to. You can, incidentally, still hear the buzzing of the helicopter, which, for reasons that pass all understanding, the BBC and Sky have orbiting Parliament at the moment to get aerial shots of the building during this important debate.

[00:01:21] Heaven only knows why they bother to do that, but they do. So apologies in advance for the buzzing you can hear in the background. But that's the least of today's events. It's been an extremely interesting debate. Conducted in a very, very serious manner. It was quite noticeable, for example, that when Mr Speaker read out the totals voting for and against the Bill, there wasn't a great erupting cheer to celebrate the victory that the Bill had cleared its second reading.

[00:01:46] It was far too serious an occasion for that. And now the Bill goes off for further consideration in a Public Bill Committee, and starts its journey through the elaborate machinery of Parliament.

[00:01:57] Ruth Fox: Yeah, I was struck as you were by that moment when they announced the result. It was not quite as close as I thought it might be.

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

Apple

YouTube Podcasts

Spotify

More ways to subscribe

Parliament Matters homepage

Latest / Highlights

Submissions / Parliamentary scrutiny of treaties - Our evidence to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee

Our evidence on treaty scrutiny has been published by the House of Lords International Agreements Committee. Our submission outlines the problems with the existing framework for treaty scrutiny and why legislative and cultural change are needed to improve Parliament's scrutiny role. Our evidence joins calls for a parliamentary consent vote for the most significant agreements, a stronger role for Parliament in shaping negotiating mandates and monitoring progress, and a sifting committee tasked with determining which agreements warrant the greatest scrutiny.

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 2-6 June 2025

Legislation to give Ministers powers to update product regulations, including by aligning with EU standards, will be debated by MPs. The battle between the Commons and the Lords over AI and copyright provisions in the Data (Use and Access) Bill enters a further round, led by Baroness Kidron who is championing the interests of the creative industries. MPs will debate an e-petition to decriminalise abortion. The Border Security Bill, Employment Rights Bill, and Sentencing Guidelines Bill will be scrutinised by Peers. There are backbench debates on high street banking closures and the safety of battery energy storage. Increases to Peers' allowances and a new second homes allowance will be put to the Lords. The Home Secretary and Lord Chancellor face oral questions from MPs.

News / Will Parliament get its teeth into Keir Starmer's trade deals? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 94

You wait ages for a post-Brexit trade deal – and then three show up at once. With the Government unveiling new agreements with India, the US and the EU, we explore why Parliament has so little influence over these major international agreements. Liam Byrne MP, a former Labour Minister and current chair of the House of Commons Business and Trade Committee argues that this needs to change. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

News / Assisted dying bill: Special series #12 - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 93

Is Kim Leadbeater's Assisted Dying Bill now "over the hump?" The Bill's supporters got it though its first day of Report Stage consideration in the House of Commons unscathed, with comfortable majorities in every vote. So, with debate on the most contentious set of amendments disposed of, will it now coast through its remaining scrutiny days in the Commons? Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

Submissions / Status and rights of independent MPs in Parliament – Our evidence to the House of Commons Procedure Committee

Our evidence on the status and rights of independent MPs has been published by the House of Commons Procedure Committee. Our submission summarises the direct and indirect references to political parties in the Standing Orders and whether they might apply to groupings of independent MPs, analyses whether small parties and independent groupings face disadvantages, particularly in relation to committee membership, and considers whether parliamentary publications should distinguish between the many different kinds of independent MP.