Spooks, the Ombudsman and the Royal Albert Hall - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 92

News

Spooks, the Ombudsman and the Royal Albert Hall - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 92

14 May 2025

Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) – not a select committee, but a group of senior MPs and Peers appointed by the PM – has a “canary in the coalmine” function, to keep an eye on the security and intelligence services and reassure Westminster that all is well. But last week the canary emitted a loud squawk. The ISC raised concerns about its secretariat being under-funded and too tightly controlled by the Cabinet Office – issues that could hinder its independence and effectiveness.

Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

LISTEN

Ruth and Mark spoke with the Chair of the ISC – former Labour Defence Minister Kevan Jones, now Lord Beamish – about his efforts to ensure robust, interference-free oversight of Britain’s spooks, and the growing threats facing the UK today.

And then there’s the mystery of the missing Ombudsman: why has it taken so long for a new Ombudsman to be appointed to investigate maladministration by Government and the NHS? Veteran Westminster-watcher, journalist David Hencke, untangles the chain of events which culminated in the recent pre-appointment hearing of nominee Paula Sussex before the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Select Committee.

We also tackle listeners’ latest questions on a backbench MP’s battle to get a debate on the obscure Royal Albert Hall Bill, whether the next Speaker of the Commons has to be a man, and why MPs don’t use spare time in the House of Commons Chamber more productively.

← Back to Parliament Matters homepage

Listen on our YouTube channel (captioned)

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Our guests

Lord Beamish

Lord Beamish (Kevan Jones) is a Labour Member of the House of Lords and the Chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee. Before entering the House of Lords, he sat in the House of Commons for 23 years as the Member of Parliament for Durham, during which time he served as the Veterans Minister under Gordon Brown, as a Shadow Defence Minister from 2010 to 2016, and sat on a number of select committees, including the Defence Select Committee (2001-09, 2020-24), Procedure Committee (2020-24) and the Intelligence and Security Committee (2017-24).

David Hencke

David Hencke began his career on local newspapers and The Times Higher Education Supplement, before he joined The Guardian in 1976. Ten years later he became the newspaper’s Westminster lobby correspondent, winning several awards for investigations into “cash for questions” and other political scandals. In 2012 he was named Political Journalist of the Year in the British Journalism Awards. Since 2009 he has been a freelance writer, with regular investigative articles in Byline Times and on his own blog, Westminster Confidential.

Resources

Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament

Transcript

Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.

Intro: [00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.

Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.

Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. Coming up in this week's episode,

Ruth Fox: Scrutinising the spies, why the Chair of Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee has gone public with his concerns about attempts by Whitehall to control its work.

Mark D'Arcy: The mystery of the missing ombudsman.

Ruth Fox: And parliamentary shenanigans over the Royal Albert Hall. What is going on?

Mark D'Arcy: But Ruth, let's start with the spies. In a week when Parliament discussed in incredibly guarded terms, the latest series of terror arrests, and it was made very, very clear [00:01:00] that these kind of matters can't easily be discussed in open debate on the floor of the House of Commons, all eyes turned to Parliament's intelligence and security watchdog, the ISC, the Intelligence and Security Committee. It's a rather unusual parliamentary organ because it's not directly elected by MPs. It is in fact appointed by the Prime Minister and it has very much the function of a canary in a coal mine. It can give a warning if things are going really amis.

If, for example, members started to resign from that committee, you'd know that there was real trouble in spook land and last week it didn't so much trill a warning as emit an outraged squawk in the form of a press release from its chairman, Lord Beamish, the Labour former defence minister Kevan Jones, who complained in vociferous terms that its internal workings were too much under the control of civil servants in the Cabinet Office.

We talked to him in his parliamentary office.

Lord Beamish: Well, I've been on the committee now eight years, so I was the most senior person remaining on the committee. It's a strange committee, as you say. [00:02:00] It's appointed by the Prime Minister, the nominees. There's nine members of the committee. It's not a select committee of Parliament.

It's actually a committee, which is set up by statute, the Justice and Security Act 2013. And it gives us quite wide ranging powers, including being able to monitor the activities of our security services. And that's about not just ensuring that money's being spent properly, but I think one of the agency ethics says that we give it their license to operate in terms of having the confidence that they're doing things correctly.

Mark D'Arcy: And I suppose events this week, you know, there's been this case of a big set of arrests. We don't know what's going to happen in the individual case or the rights and wrongs of the individuals there, but it was very noticeable watching Dan Jarvis, the Security Minister in the Commons Chamber being very guarded about what he felt he could say.

The prime purpose of your committee is a kind of reassurance mechanism. They may not be able to tell parliamentarians on the floor of the House of Commons and the House of Lords exactly what's going on, but they can point to a group of [00:03:00] people who are to some extent in the know, and other than think it's okay.

Lord Beamish: Yeah, I'd go further than that…

Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.

Apple

YouTube Podcasts

Spotify

More ways to subscribe

Parliament Matters homepage

Latest / Highlights

News / Parliament Matters Bulletin: What’s coming up in Parliament this week? 27-31 October 2025

The Attorney General, the Chief Secretary to the PM and the Head of the Crown Prosecution Service will face questions after the collapse of the China spying case. Nigel Farage plans to introduce a Bill to withdraw from the ECHR. MPs will question Yvette Cooper and Pat McFadden, and debate property service charges and end-of-life care. The Conservatives will choose Tuesday’s Opposition Day topic. In the Lords, Peers will debate Ukraine and hear from the Justice Minister and hospice and care sector representatives on the assisted dying bill. The Victims and Courts Bill and the Sentencing Bill have their final Commons stages, while in the Lords the Planning and Infrastructure Bill and the Employment Rights Bill face further scrutiny.

News / Parliament vs. Prince Andrew - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 111

This week, we explore how far Parliament can go in holding members of the Royal Family to account, as pressure grows for MPs to scrutinise Prince Andrew’s finances and royal titles. We ask whether Nigel Farage should get a right of reply at Prime Minister’s Questions amid his growing prominence, and examine Labour’s reshuffle of select committee posts and calls for greater transparency in how they’re filled. Plus, a look back at the rebuilding of the House of Commons Chamber, 75 years after its postwar reopening. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

News / Parliament’s spying scandal: Why was the China case dropped? - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 110

It’s been a tumultuous week in Westminster, with three ministerial statements on the China spying case and fresh questions about the collapse of charges against two alleged spies. We are joined by Cambridge public law expert Professor Mark Elliott to untangle the legal and political fallout, from espionage claims inside MPs’ offices to confusion over whether China was ever designated an “enemy state.” We also explore looming government challenges — the Budget, Afghan data leak, local election setbacks — and the membership of the new Select Committee to consider the assisted dying legislation in the House of Lords. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.

Briefings / Assisted dying - The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Rolling news

Stay informed with updates and analysis on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill as it moves through Parliament. Learn about the debates, procedures, decisions, and key milestones shaping the assisted dying legislation.

News / What are the Usual Channels? A short history of Westminster whipping - Parliament Matters podcast, Episode 108

In this episode, we talk to political journalist Seb Whale about his new book, The Usual Channels, which reveals the hidden world of Westminster’s whips. Seb charts how party discipline has evolved – from the stormy politics of the 1970s and the Maastricht battles of the 1990s to the legendary “black book,” the Brexit showdowns and the short-lived Liz Truss premiership. He explains how the whips’ office has adapted to a modern Parliament – especially with the influx of women MPs – and why, even today, whips still wield decisive influence over MPs’ careers and remain indispensable despite the pressures of contemporary politics. Please help us by completing our Listener Survey. It will only take a few minutes.